By Michael Kaufman

I have often wondered how much it has cost the taxpayers of Orange County to pay for the various plans put forward regarding the storm-damaged Government Center in Goshen. The controversial edifice designed by renowned architect Paul Rudolph has been closed “until further notice” since September 8, 2011. A partial answer came Monday when Legislator Roseanne Sullivan asked County Executive Steve (What, Me Worry?) Neuhaus why he had never seriously considered a proposal by architect Gene (not my brother with the same name) Kaufman that would save taxpayers “approximately $26 million.”

The reply by Neuhaus, as reported by Chris McKenna in Wednesday’s Times Herald-Record, was astounding: “Neuhaus responded that the county has spent $2.6 million so far on Clark Patterson Lee’s plans….” So far?  Is he suggesting the county may be paying them even more for plans before a single shovel hits the soil? Until recently Clark Patterson Lee’s plans called for a renovation that would cost an estimated $73 million. Cost-conscious legislators were recently able to pare the figure down to $68 million by removing a proposed façade that was included simply for cosmetic reasons. (Some people hate the Rudolph design so much they were willing to spend millions of dollars of taxpayer money just to cover it up.)

Neuhaus seems to be saying that it would be a waste of at least $2.6 million in design costs if the county doesn’t move forward with Clark Patterson Lee’s $68 million renovation plan. But as Sullivan and other level-headed legislators have pointed out, it doesn’t make any sense to waste a lot more money when there is an alternative that can save $26 million dollars. This seems like a no brainer but Neuhaus told reporter McKenna that “nothing has changed in the status of the current project to justify further discussions with Kaufman.” Some may be tempted at this juncture to question the county executive’s math skills or even his intelligence, but Neuhaus knows exactly what he is doing. He is, after all, a cunning and ambitious politician with an uncanny ability to talk out of both sides of his mouth.  (For an excellent illustration of this phenomenon, see the Feb. 26 post at Orange County (NY) Outlook by Auntie Alibi.)

Sullivan, a Democrat who represents residents of Crawford and Wallkill in the 18th Legislative District, says that Clark Patterson Lee’s high-priced plans have “thoroughly convinced” her that their project will be a disaster. “They should have been fired when they offered a job to the legislator who was chairman of the committee that had oversight on the project.” That would be one Leigh Benton, a Republican who has represented the Town of Newburgh in the 16^th Legislative District since 2005. It was Benton who pushed the Clark Patterson Lee plan through the committee before revealing that he had accepted a job offer from the firm. A subsequent investigation found that although his behavior was questionable, there was nothing in the code of ethics that specifically forbade it.

In the end Benton regretfully turned down the lucrative job offer. Of course the honorable thing for him to have done was resign. Instead he unapologetically remained in the legislature, was later re-elected by the few who turned out to vote on Election Day, and has continued to cast votes on the Government Center issue with head held high. In his mind he was exonerated. Note that Sheldon Silver says he will be “exonerated” if it is ultimately determined that his acceptance of millions of dollars in “consultant fees” is not evidence of criminal behavior. But this is a misuse of the word. One is exonerated if one is wrongly accused and found innocent of wrongdoing. Someone who does something sleazy and unethical but manages to avoid being convicted of a crime is not innocent of wrongdoing. They are just damn lucky they got away with it.

Michael can be reached at michael@zestoforange.com.

By Michael Kaufman

I tried in vain to differentiate between the knaves and fools among the 12 Orange County legislators who cast 12 futile votes Thursday to authorize the sale of the Valley View Center for Nursing Care and Rehabilitation. The vote came after several hours of public comments that again made it abundantly clear to everyone in the packed auditorium (except for the aforementioned 12 knaves or fools) that the overwhelming majority of Orange County residents want to keep Valley View publicly owned.

I wish I were an expert in interpreting body language or had one with me during the session. He or she would have been able to explain why some legislators’ faces turned red as beets and others slunk into their seats and avoided eye contact with audience members. Curlie Dillard, the sole Democrat among the 12, was careful not to attract attention to his self and uttered but one word during the entire session, a quick “yes” during the roll call. Democratic Caucus Chair Jeff Berkman, whose plan to “save Valley View by downsizing it” (and selling some beds to a private for-profit company) was dead in the water before the meeting started, appeared humble as he explained his reasoning. In the end, however, he joined the rest of his caucus (with the exception of the aforementioned Dillard) in voting “no” and denying County Executive Steve Neuhaus the requisite 14-vote supermajority he craves.

Chairman Steve Brescia did an admirable job of running the meeting and keeping a straight face while knowing that nothing said—no matter how factual, eloquent or passionate—would change his mind or those of the other 11 knaves or fools.  Was that stress-induced rosacea on Legislator Michael Amo’s face or was it that red because his bow tie was too tight around his neck? Amo, introduced by Brescia as “party leader Amo” because he is chair (and sole member) of the legislature’s one-man Independence Party caucus, voted “yes” after a peculiar but apparently sincere soliloquy lamenting that more isn’t being done to enable families to care for loved ones at home.

Republican Dennis Simmons got red-faced as he listened to a host of veterans who questioned the legislature’s commitment to the men and women who have served in the military to protect our rights and are now in need of care. He’s a veteran too, he said, and recited his name, rank, and serial number to prove it. He said he knows from experience of his own family members that you can get really good care from low-paid workers at private nursing homes. He objected to those who would “besmirch” those workers’ reputations! (He also complained that former County Executive Ed Diana’s reputation got “besmirched” on a previous occasion.) This was after several speakers cited statistics comparing the large number of complaints filed against Focus, the private operator said to be the favorite to take over Valley View, versus the small number of complaints filed against Valley View. One of the complaints against Focus involved sexual abuse of an elderly woman and Simmons thought it was a cheap shot to mention it.

Majority Leader Melissa Bonacic did not seem at all uncomfortable as she thanked the veterans in attendance for their service and assured them that this legislature (which as presently composed seems incapable of governing its way out of a paper bag) would see to it that all current residents of Valley View would receive the same level of care if Valley View were sold to a private operator. Her reasoning was twofold (and also places her squarely in the fool category): “It’s the trend,” she explained, adding that counties all over the state are getting rid of their nursing homes and that she’s scared. Her second reason? “I don’t believe the county should be in the nursing home business.”

But that is precisely the point. Valley View has thrived lo these past 183 years because it is not a “business.” It has been publicly owned, supported by tax dollars, and provides a vital service to the residents of Orange County. Assurances from Bonacic or any other county legislator that the quality of care will be maintained for current and future residents if the facility is privatized must be taken with at least 12 grains of salt. And speaking of future residents, here are some other things to consider: Orange County is one of the fastest growing counties in the state in terms of population. The so-called middle class is shrinking here as it is throughout the USA with no end in sight to the rise in wealth inequality. People are living longer. Taken together this means more people among the lower 99 percent will be in need of the services provided by Valley View simply because they won’t be able to afford to pay for equivalent quality care at a private facility.

Thanks are in order to the nine legislators who stood fast against the bullying of the county executive and his minions in the legislature. Several deserve special mention, most notably Republican Mike Anagnostakis, who has put in many hours studying the flawed 2015 budget proposed by Neuhaus and has suggested reality-based alternatives to the sale of Valley View, upon which the Neuhaus budget relies. Unflinching support for Valley View also came from Democrats Matt Turnbull, Roseanne Sullivan, Chris Eachus, and Myrna Kemnitz.

Thanks to them and the handful of other Democrats who voted no, Valley View will now be funded for a full year instead of a few months. But this fight is far from over. The private nursing home operators see gold in “them thar hills” of Goshen. And Neuhaus and his knaves and fools will continue to do all they can to hand it over to them.

Michael can be reached at michael@zestoforange.com.

By Michael Kaufman

Orange County legislator Mike Anagnostakis was so troubled after reading through the $703.2 million 2015 budget proposed by County Executive Steve Neuhaus last week that he sent a letter to all his legislative colleagues to share his concerns. A centerpiece of the Neuhaus budget plan is the sale of the county-owned Valley View Center for Nursing Care and Rehabilitation to a private, for-profit nursing home company. Neuhaus, who was elected in November after promising voters he would not seek to sell Valley View, now says he anticipates using $15 million from its sale to help close a projected deficit of $63 million.

Anagnostakis, the lone Republican who has steadfastly opposed privatization of Valley View, told colleagues he is troubled by a number of aspects of the proposed budget. “No matter what side of the issue you are on with Valley View,” he wrote, “I would think these items would be a problem if we are trying to do the PROCESS the right way and get a true budget done” to solve problems facing the county. “Most troubling,” he said, is his feeling that the proposed budget is “illegal on many levels.”

“By charter we must fund fully all departments within the charter,” he continued, noting that when Neuhaus’ predecessor Ed Diana, attempted to stop funding Valley View in 2013, the New York State Supreme Court ruled unequivocally, “what the County Executive seeks to do within the confines of the 2013 budget, i.e., to unilaterally close Valley View.…constitutes an impermissible violation of the doctrine of separation of powers.”

Furthermore, said Anagnostakis, using a “one-shot” infusion of $15 million from the sale of Valley View is “contingent on many things happening” and “New York State law does not allow for this kind of a contingent budget item.” He said one of three things will occur if the proposed budget is passed: There may not be the 14-vote supermajority required to sell Valley View; or if there are 14 votes, the resolution may be challenged in court and found illegal; or, even if a Local Law is passed with 14 votes “it will not be in place until AFTER an election occurs, if enough signatures are obtained, and ONLY if the sell Valley View side wins that election, which would be MANY MANY months after the budget needs to be in place.” In each of those scenarios, Anagnostakis told fellow legislators, “this budget would not be legally balanced and I fear we will find ourselves in another court case.”

Anagnostakis pointed out that Neuhaus had “railed against Diana and previous legislators” for failing to have structural balanced budgets (income equaling expenses) because they used about $40 million per year from general fund surplus, other reserves and “one-shots” to balance the budgets. Yet he does the same thing in his proposed budget “by using $45.8 million in general fund surplus, other reserves and ‘one-shots’….Included in that amount are the $15 million from selling Valley View (to balance the other departments deficits) and $8.4 million of Tobacco reserves (instead of using them for anti-smoking programs). The structural deficit would only be cut by about $10 million, so if we had a budget deficit of $63 million this year, then our deficit will still be $53 million for the start of the following year (and we would not even own Valley View at that point).”

He cited several other examples where “the numbers in this budget do not ring true.” For example, the budget “does not itemize one penny for the legacy costs for Valley View which will still be in the $5-$7 million range.” Noting that the 2015 budget to run Valley View has been estimated to be around $5.5 million, he concluded, “it very well may cost taxpayers more yearly to sell the facility than to keep it.”

Asked if he has received any responses to his letter, Anagnostakis said, “Not a single Legislator has given any response!” But there are four Democrats who he says work with him “because they understand what is going on.” The big problem is ALL the Republicans (and Independence Party legislator Michael Amo, who votes with the Republicans) who never have an open mind and only do what is asked of them.”

Michael can be reached at michael@zestoforange.com.

By Michael Kaufman

As if on cue, Orange County Executive Steve (Bait-and-Switch) Neuhaus proposed a $703.2 million budget Wednesday that included a threat to lay off hundreds of county workers if the county legislature does not agree to sell the Valley View Center for Nursing Care and Rehabilitation to a private, for-profit operator. “Just on the face of it—lots of smoke and mirrors in order to get ONE result … sell Valley View,” said legislator Mike Anagstonakis, who has consistently voiced opposition to privatization, after listening to Neuhaus outline his budget plan.

Democratic caucus leader Jeff Berkman agreed that the budget as outlined by Neuhaus “was steered toward one conclusion only, which was to sell Valley View.” Both Anagstonakis, the lone Republican legislator committed to keeping Valley View county owned, and Berkman, whose caucus has mustered enough votes to deny the supermajority required to proceed with the sale, said they need to read through the entire proposal before commenting further. Berkman, however, also said he agrees with Neuhaus that the county has serious financial problems and that he appreciates the county executive’s appeal for bipartisan efforts to find solutions. But is there really anything to appreciate? Neuhaus has never reached out to the Democrats before and the only reason he is doing so now is because he needs a couple of their votes if he is to succeed in selling Valley View.

Berkman, meanwhile, has drafted his own proposal to “downsize Valley View as a way to save it.” The centerpiece of his plan is to sell 120 of the 360 beds at Valley View to a private operator and reduce the number of workers at Valley View. “Some county employees may have to face the choice of relocation to other county department positions,” notes Berkman, and others would have to agree to accept employment with the for-profit facility. Under his plan those who agree to be transferred would have “first priority consideration” to be hired and would also retain their right to union representation.

Is it a coincidence that both Neuhaus and Berkman seem to have the same private operator in mind? As reported by Chris McKenna in Thursday’s Times Herald-Record, Neuhaus “touted plans by prospective buyers to expand services to Valley View and offer jobs to its current employees. He highlighted one suitor in particular, which is said to have already developed a partnership with the new medical school Touro College opened this summer in Middletown.” Berkman meanwhile suggests the 120 beds “be transferred to a private operator affiliated with Touro Medical School,” and notes that the Danza Group, “owner of the former Horton Hospital where Touro-Middletown is located, could partner with a firm that provides quality nursing care and can be affiliated with Touro Medical School.” Valley View would remain as a 240 bed, county-owned facility, “and not be considered for sale, transfer, or corporate ownership alteration for a period of no less than two years.”

Two years? I guess that’s better than the May 1 deadline proposed by Neuhaus to end county funding of Valley View. It seems our Orange County government sometimes bears a striking resemblance to the federal government. I can envisage a moment where Berkman and Neuhaus negotiate an agreement on Valley View, after which a grinning Neuhaus declares, “I got 98% of what I wanted.”

We can’t let this happen.

Michael can be reached at michael@zestoforange.com.

By Michael Kaufman

Well, the good news is that the Orange County Legislature Republican majority has been forced to put off voting on a new proposal to transfer the Valley View Center for Nursing Care and Rehabilitation to a local development corporation (LDC) for at least 30 days. The rumored defection of two or more Democratic legislators, which would have given County Executive Steve Neuhaus the supermajority he needs to move forward with the sale of Valley View, did not take place when the legislators met earlier this week.

“Simply put, the Democrats have held together,” noted Michael Sussman, the Goshen attorney who won a lawsuit filed on behalf of Valley View workers and residents who oppose privatization. “Absent the votes, the Republicans do not want to face defeat again and certainly do not want to pass a Local Law subject to permissive referendum. So the chair of the legislature has asked the head of the Rules Committee to pull this item from the October 2 meeting.” (A Local Law requires only a simple majority but can be challenged by a referendum, which would allow county residents to vote on whether Valley View will remain publicly owned or sold to a private operator to be run for profit.) Sussman said he “could not be more thrilled” by the victory although he is keenly aware it may be short-lived. “I know they will not give up.”

“I’ve never seen an obsession like the obsession to privatize Valley View, now in its eighth year,” says Pamela Chergotis, managing editor of the weekly Chronicle, which has been providing superb coverage (by Chergotis and investigative reporter Nathan Mayberg) on Valley View, as well as the ongoing government center fiasco, and other controversial local political issues. “The fever isn’t breaking,” adds Chergotis. “The tactic seems to be to just wear people down—journalists, activists, Democrats, and supporters alike.”

Chergotis herself was the victim of a mean-spirited attack by Neuhaus following the ruling by Orange County Supreme Court Justice Elaine Slobod invalidating the LDC he illegally appointed. “Steve said I put Valley View on the front page every week for six months (not true either) because my mother died in Valley View in February and ‘it’s personal for them.’ My mother died 12 years ago in New Jersey and as far as I know never stepped foot in Orange County.” In the same statement, reported in the Times Herald-Record, Neuhaus suggested that both the judge and Chergotis are “too emotional and too lacking in professional detachment to do their jobs.” Chergotis says some have suggested to her that “sexism is afoot.” Sexism on the part of a Republican elected official? Impossible!.

Meanwhile, expect Neuhaus to keep the pressure on Democrats to cave on Valley View by threatening massive layoffs of other county workers if Valley View isn’t sold.

Endnote—Certain events inevitably bring out my inner Yippie. Imagine if Abbie Hoffman were still with us and had received an invitation to a “Free Private Event” at the Renaissance Faire’s Peacock Pavilion hosted by Genting “to thank our Warwick and Greenwood Lake supporters” of their plans for a Sterling Forest Resort casino. The event will include live entertainment, dinner and an info session (“By privately funding a Thruway exit, hiring locally, and improving local parkland (!), we are committed to improving the region’s quality of life and financial stability.”) The shindig takes place Saturday, Sept. 20, from 6:30 to 9:30 p.m. The catch is that you have to RSVP and present the invitation card at the “Will Call” booth. But Abbie would have found a way to get in even without the invitation.

Michael can be reached at michael@zestoforange.com.

By Michael Kaufman

As local government officials throughout our region slobber, beg, and otherwise outdo themselves groveling in hope of landing a casino in their midst, area residents have few objective sources for information. Competition among the various bidders has been an advertising bonanza for local media outlets, which have tended to extol the benefits (even the “indirect benefits” to neighboring communities such as, say, Greenwood Lake and Warwick) and pay little, if any, attention to the potential negative effects. Too bad the developers are not required to include in their advertisements the same sort of warnings required of pharmaceutical companies when advertising their wares. At least a fellow with “low-T” or a flaccid penis, for example, can weigh the pros and cons of seeking a prescription if he listens closely to the staccato recitation of potential side effects at the end of the commercial or reads the fine print below the newspaper ad.

Negative publicity about any of the casino proposals thus far seems mainly to have been generated by the competitors themselves. Witness Orange County’s current legal counsel Langdon Chapman’s hatchet job on his former employer, Ulster County. (Chapman was at his sleazy best again this week as he joined Orange County Executive Steve “Pinocchio” Neuhaus in an ill-advised attempt to smear Judge Elaine Slobod because of her ruling about Valley View. But that’s a whole ‘nother story.)  

Earlier this week Town of Tuxedo officials gave their approval to one of the most odious of the casino proposals—Genting’s plan to erect a Las Vegas style luxury resort casino hotel in Sterling Forest. Genting has outspent the competition in advertising as well as in goodwill gestures designed to generate local popular support. It’s “no strings attached” donation of hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Tuxedo public schools was a public relations coup.  

Brushed aside were objections such as those made by James Hall, Executive Director of the Palisades Interstate Parks Commission (PIPC), whose letter to Tuxedo Town Supervisor Mike Rost was posted online by the Tuxedo Park FYI website June 16. Hall said he has “significant concerns regarding this proposal and potential impacts on our park land and critical natural resources we are charged to protect.

“Of most critical concern are the potential impacts on the water resources which were among the primary purposes that Sterling Forest was preserved under the unique partnership of the Palisades Interstate Park Commission, the National Park Service, the State of New York, the State of New Jersey and many not for profit organizations. I am specifically concerned about how such a development will obtain its water supply and depose of wastewater and how such actions may impact park property, its water and other significant ecological resources.”

Although the plans include a promise to develop a new exit (15b) off the New York State Thruway, Hall noted that “such a plan would require the acquisition of park property. No one has approached the Commission regarding this issue and the Commission does not support such an acquisition and such a conveyance is not authorized under our Federal Congressional Compact.” (Genting has since responded, saying it is willing to work with all interested parties and will pay for everything so there is no need to worry.)           

“Given the extremely limited information and preliminary nature of the proposal,” Hall continued, “I do not support the proposed plan and likewise feel it is inappropriate and premature for the Town to endorse such a massive project without a better understanding of the associated impacts and whether critical components such as exit 15b are even legally practical considerations underpinning the proposal, not to mention completely unknown impacts of the critical water resources of the area….

“The Commission’s properties are a significant asset of the Town,” concluded Hall, “providing significant tax payment in exchange for few services. I hope that the Town will take these concerns seriously as you make this critical decision regarding community support of the project.”

But last week, consultants hired by the town (with money generously donated by Genting) presented a rosy report citing the many positive impacts they predict will be forthcoming. The “significant tax payment” by the PIPC seems a mere pittance compared to all the goodies promised by Genting, along with some fine print that has yet to be revealed.

For more on the subject, including the full text of Hall’s letter, visit the Tuxedo Park FYI website.

Michael can be reached at michael@zestoforange.com.

By Michael Kaufman

Isaac Bashevis Singer might as well have been describing Orange County when he wrote, “The village of Chelm (Orange County) was ruled by the head of the community council (county executive) and the elders (county legislators), all fools. The name of the head was Gronam Ox (Steve Neuhaus). The elders were Dopey Lekisch, Zeinvel Ninny, Treitel Fool, Sender Donkey, Shmendrick Numskull, and Feivel Thickwit.” Take your pick if you live in any of the legislative districts represented by a Republican other than Mike Anagnostakis.

Lest we forget Orange County’s own little Chelm, the village of Kiryas Joel, populated by members of the Satmar Hasidic sect, is represented by “Shlemiel the beadle” (Michael Amo) of the Independence Party. “I could be the Elephant Party and they’d elect me,” Amo proudly told the weekly Chronicle in an interview last year.  “Many of my colleagues know that if they do not belong to a mainstream party, they are not going to get elected. For me, I don’t have to worry about that.” He said he switched from being a Republican to the Independence Party because of the latter’s commitment to fiscal conservatism. “We want to make sure that if we spend a dollar, we get a dollar’s worth of work,” he explained in true Shlemiel-like fashion: His votes on key issues such as privatization of Valley View and rebuilding the government center in Goshen would ensure quite the opposite, however.

It is also no secret that Independence Party endorsements in the Hudson Valley are guided by influential Republican State Senator John Bonacic and fellow Republican wheeler-dealer Langdon Chapman. The idea is to attract voters who like to think of themselves as independent rather than affiliate with either of the two major parties. The strategy is working. As reported by the Chronicle, the number of Independence Party voters in Orange County rose from roughly 500 voters in 2008 to more than 10,000 in 2012, making it the fastest-growing bloc of voters in the county. Most are aged 18 to 34. And, as it turns out, quite a few reside in Kiryas Joel, where bloc voting is observed almost as strictly as kosher dietary laws.

And so it was that a select group of villagers of Kiryas Joel came to the aid of Orange’s own Gronam Ox (Neuhaus) by registering as members of the Working Families Party in order to  vote in that party’s primary election to determine its designated candidate for county executive last year.  As reported by the Times Herald-Record, “Democratic candidate Roxanne Donnery had gotten the customary blessing of the Working Families Party to run on its ballot line, but found herself challenged by her adversaries in the Village of Kiryas Joel, who petitioned for a primary and signed up dozens of new voters in the labor-backed party.”

The newly registered Working Families voters were provided with a hand stamp to use to print the name “Niki Lee Rowe” on the ballot. Ms. Rowe wasn’t really running for county executive. But she received enough “stamp-in” votes to deny Donnery the Working Families line on the ballot in November. And lo and behold,  Ms. Rowe is also none other than “Mrs. Shlemiel,” aka the wife of county legislator Amo.  An election inspector confiscated the stamp and turned it over to Gimpel the Fool (David Green, Orange County’s Republican election commissioner). One can imagine Green pulling at his beard and rubbing his forehead to show that his brain was hard at work, before ruling that stamping Rowe’s name on ballots was legal, although circulating the stamp inside the polling station was not.

This brings us to the present, as the fools now in charge of governing Orange County ponder the latest developments regarding their ill-fated, ill-advised $74 million renovation plan for the Orange County Government Center. More on this subject next week.

VALLEY VIEW UPDATE—Upwards of 200 people attended Sunday’s rally in Goshen to save the Valley View Center for Nursing Care and Rehabilitation from privatization. The event, organized by the Citizens for Valley View (CVV), was not covered by the Times Herald-Record, but you can learn more and keep up with future events by checking out the group’s Facebook page.

EVENT OF INTEREST—An all-star group of musicians and poets will present “A tribute to Harry Smith Anthology to benefit Hungry for Music” at 7:30 p.m., Saturday, June 14, at the Bearsville Theater in Woodstock. Hungry for Music provides musical instruments to underserved children with a “hunger to play.” The concert culminates a month-long Hudson Valley music instrument drive sponsored by RadioWoodstock. Click here for more information and a list of performing artists.

Michael can be reached at michael@zestoforange.com.

By Michael Kaufman

By the time anyone is finished trying to unravel the seemingly endless tangled web of deceit involved, it seems nearly certain that Orange County will soon be home to a lavish, world-class casino resort hotel.  The only question is where it will be built, and some of the options are frightening. Meanwhile, the folks in Sullivan County, who had high hopes that construction of one—or even two—casinos would revitalize that county’s flagging tourism business, are still scratching their heads like someone who’s been sucker punched and is just starting to wonder what the heck happened.

Ulster County officials, who support a proposal for a casino at the Nevele Hotel site in Ellenville, are still reeling from what they regard as a betrayal by Langdon Chapman, who was legislative attorney for the county in 2012 and 2013. In that role he helped draft at least one resolution adopted by the county legislature in support of the Nevele casino bid. Chapman has been singing a different tune, however, since January when he was appointed Orange County Attorney by County Executive Steve Neuhaus (who knows a thing or two about betrayal of the public trust). Chapman recently told the Woodstock Times there is “not a chance” the Nevele proposal will be successful:  “Look at it from a businessman’s point of view.” This led Ulster’s current legislative attorney, the interestingly named Cappy Weiner, to fire off a letter to Chapman saying his comments were “inappropriate and a violation of your duty to a former client.”  Weiner also insisted that “no further comments be made contrary to the interest of the Ulster County Legislature.”

Chances of the Nevele getting a casino have also been undercut in recent weeks by a sensational report in the May 1 edition of Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post that Michael Treanor, head of the Nevele investors’ group, had been accused in a lawsuit of sexually assaulting his sister. (The report would have been even more sensational if the alleged assault had not occurred in 2008 and the lawsuit had not been settled in 2009.) Treanor told the Woodstock Times he believes Chapman is responsible for leaking the sex abuse allegations to the Post because of Treanor’s longtime opposition to Orange County being considered as a potential site for casinos. Chapman denies he was the source. (Personally, I wouldn’t buy a used car from either Treanor or Chapman.)

Chapman has long had a close working relationship with the power-wielding (and constantly sending self-serving junk mail about himself) Republican State Senator John Bonacic, whose district includes all or parts of Delaware, Sullivan, Orange, and Ulster Counties. Bonacic had been an outspoken supporter of Sullivan County as a casino site but his more recent statements on the subject have been equivocal.

Chapman is also a partner in the Warwick-based law practice headed by Bonacic’s son Scott and Robert Krahulik, who was recently forced to resign from his post as chair of the Orange County Republican Committee because of some alleged Weiner-like (Anthony not Cappy) internet behavior.  And Chapman plays a major role in determining who gets to run for office on the Independence Party line in the Hudson Valley (another topic that warrants further discussion). He is also likely to have been involved in the stealth campaign that subverted Democrat Roxanne Donnery’s bid to obtain the Working Families Party line on the ballot in last year’s election for Orange County Executive, which Republican Neuhaus won handily with the endorsement of the Independence Party. (Bonacic, Krahulik and Associates, LLP, is no stranger to successful stealth campaigns, as former Warwick Village Justice Richard Farina can attest.)

Meanwhile, the potential casino developers are tripping over themselves to show how civic minded they are and how wonderful it will be if we are fortunate enough to have them build near us. Genting, the Malaysian-based gambling giant that hopes to befoul Sterling Forest, just made a “no-strings attached” donation of $340,000 to the Tuxedo public schools to prevent substantial cuts in programs that would have been necessary as a result of the outcome of the May 20 school budget vote. As reported by Gittel Evangelist in the Times Herald-Record, “District officials stressed their acceptance of the ‘gift toward education’ was not an approval of the proposed casino.” Does this sound too good to be true?

The Record also reports that both the Town and City of Newburgh have endorsed the Hudson Valley Casino Resort proposal made by Saratoga Casino and Raceway. The town hopes to receive an annual host community fee of $6.8 million, of which $1.02 million (15 percent) would  go to the city to use as it pleases. “I don’t think it’s enough,” said City Councilwoman Genie Abrams. “But we’ll take the $1 million per year.” Of course it is not enough. And it is they who are being taken. The proposed developer is the group that already operates a quasi-casino with slot machines at the Saratoga harness track. Voters in Saratoga County and the Village of Saratoga Springs voted overwhelmingly against having them put a Las Vegas-style casino in their midst. The news doesn’t seem to have reached Newburgh, however. That reminds me: Empire Resorts, which has already established an abysmal track record at Monticello Raceway, is one of the bidders for a casino to be built on the grounds of the old Concord Hotel. Theirs has to be considered one of the longest shots on the board, in a dead heat with Louis Cappelli, who has been promising to build on another piece of the Concord property for so long that few continue to take him seriously.

Sullivan County has indeed been sucker punched. And we in Orange are being played for suckers, and not just by the would-be casino developers. As Neuhaus and his cronies continue to rush privatization of the Valley View Center for Nursing Care and Rehabilitation, news comes that Valley View is scheduled to receive more than $4 million in federal aid than it received last year….but only if it remains publicly owned. The argument for privatization gets weaker by the day. Citizens for Valley View will hold a rally on Sunday, June 8, at 2 p.m. at Goshen Green. For more information visit Facebook.com/CFVVC.  Be there if you can.

And isn’t it time for those of us who live in Tuxedo, Greenwood Lake, and Warwick, to  raise our voices to save Sterling Forest?

Michael can be reached at michael@zestoforange.com.

By Michael Kaufman

What was disgraced former Sen. Alfonse D’Amato doing standing knee-deep in weeds Tuesday near Stewart Airport? Hint: It was probably akin to what Bugsy Siegel was doing in the mid 1940s when he stood in the desert sand of Las Vegas: envisaging the untold riches that could result from legalized casino gambling at a luxury resort hotel that could be built there.  

D’Amato’s lobbying and public relations firm has been hired to promote the efforts of Greenetrack, an Alabama-based casino emporium, one of more than 20 companies vying to be among the seven to be chosen following passage of a statewide ballot referendum last November.

The majority of Orange County residents cast votes in favor of the proposal. This may have been due in part to a change in wording of the question that appeared on the ballot. Originally written as a simple yes or no question, the language was changed by the State Legislature to link passage with creation of jobs, school funding, and lower taxes.  (They could just as well have included apple pie, motherhood, and support for the troops.)

Had the wording been comparably altered by opponents of the proposal it might have read something like: “Do you approve of allowing seven new casinos that will bring increased traffic, air pollution and other environmental hazards; attract compulsive gamblers, mobsters and grifters; put nearby local restaurants and stores out of business, and receive huge tax breaks courtesy of elected officials who they spent a lot of money lobbying?”

Aside from the rosy wording of the ballot question, Orange County residents were led to believe that any new casinos designated for construction in our region would be erected in Sullivan County, still reeling from the demise of the great Borscht Belt hotels of yore, or in neighboring Ulster. Voters in Sullivan voted overwhelmingly in favor of the resolution in hope of landing at least one of the new casinos there.

On the other hand, residents of Warwick, Greenwood Lake, Newburgh, Tuxedo, New Windsor, and Central Valley might well have been less inclined to vote in favor had they known that developers were already targeting sites in or adjacent to their communities. That is what happened in Saratoga County, including the village of Saratoga Springs, where voters overwhelmingly rejected the proposal. Perhaps this is why Orange County Executive Steve Neuhaus kept his mouth shut until after the election before he began shamelessly extolling the advantages of Orange over Sullivan and Ulster.  

And now we see full-page advertisements in the Times Herald-Record and our local weekly newspapers, seeking public support for Greenetrack’s bid. Not coincidentally the story of D’Amato’s appearance with the CEO of Greenetrack and two local officials from New Windsor was the lead story Wednesday on the Record’s page 3 (traditionally reserved for the most important news of the day) under the less-than-inspired headline, “Greenetrack makes a visit.” One of the other bidders, Saratoga Casino and Raceway, has proposed expanding its current facility at the harness track in Saratoga Springs—not likely to happen in light of strong and vocal local opposition. They have also proposed to build a casino resort across the street from Stewart Airport on 70 acres off Route 17K, but thus far they have been outspent in the lobbying and public relations department by Greenetrack.

It does make you wonder a little about Greenetrack that they turned to D’Amato for help. Here is what veteran crime reporter John Marzullo of the New York Daily News wrote about the man once affectionately known as “Senator Pothole”in an article published in March 2013: 

“A reputed Gambino capo on trial in the murders of two men proudly displayed a photo of then-U.S. Sen. Alfonse D’Amato, posing with gangsters, on the wall of his Queens social club. Ex-Bonanno associate Joseph (Giusseppe) Gambina testified Tuesday that the photo was taken at a fundraiser for “Senator Amato” in late 1991 at mobbed-up Giannini’s restaurant in Maspeth.” 

Here’s more:  “The former pol has been linked to organized crime figures in the past. He testified as a character witness at the trial of Luchese associate Philip Basile, who was charged with obtaining a no-show job for mob rat Henry Hill — who himself was immortalized in the film ‘Goodfellas.’” Marzulli went on to cite a report published in the Village Voice in the 1980s “that D’Amato had called then-Manhattan U.S. Attorney Rudy Giuliani about the sentencing of Genovese boss Vincent (Chin) Gigante’s brother Mario, a reputed capo and loan shark.”

Neuhaus, by the way, supports another site altogether. But if any site is chosen in Orange County, I’d like to ask Neuhaus how he can continue to justify the sale and privatization of Valley View if the casino brings in the millions of dollars to the county coffers he says it will. A teenie-weeinie tax on the casino profits could keep Valley View solvent for years to come.

There are so many troubling aspects to this casino story, all of which point to an attitude on the part of certain Orange County government officials that as long as something is not illegal or specifically prohibited by a code of ethics, they can do whatever they want and get away with it. So what if it is apparently sleazy and unethical.  There’s money to be had and the sheep aren’t complaining much.  Yet.

 (To be continued)

Michael can be reached at michael@zestoforange.com.

I

By Michael Kaufman

What’s wrong with this sentence, which appeared the other day in a daily newspaper in our region? “The independent board formed last month to sell Orange County’s nursing home is expected to solicit offers from prospective buyers next week and have bids by mid-June.” If you haven’t figured it out yet the answer appears in the next sentence: “Meeting for the first time Monday since being appointed by County Executive Steve Neuhaus and legislative leaders, the six volunteers initially named to the Orange Valley View Development Corporation picked a seventh member and the officers for their board, as the attorney advising them laid out a rapid timetable for their work.”

A more accurate way to put it would be, “The bunch of toadies appointed to solicit bids to sell the 360-bed Valley View Center for Nursing Care and Rehabilitation to a private, for-profit corporation is working fast because this thing stinks to high heaven and everyone in Orange County knows it.”

A bit later in the article we learn that the attorney doing the advising (also appointed by Neuhaus) is affiliated with the Harris Beach law firm, the same people hired by the county to set up the local development corporation (LDC). The stench gets even worse as readers are informed that the board’s inaugural meeting was open to the public, “except for a private session” during which the members chose officers and spoke with attorney Shawn Griffin of Harris Beach. Oh, and by the way, any future discussions about purchase offers “are expected to take place behind closed doors.”

Only one sentence mentioned perhaps the most important point: “Unless a lawsuit brought by privatization opponents invalidates the move, the LDC board can decide which bidder buys and takes over the operation of Valley View without further action by the Legislature.” That lawsuit, filed by Michael Sussman on behalf of Valley View residents, employees, not to mention most people in Orange County, has yet to be decided. But the last time the county legislators tangled with Sussman they didn’t do so hot. Our local Republicans, taking a cue from their counterparts at higher levels of government, had gerrymandered a couple of districts so as to ensure that people of color would not constitute the majority of voters. They ended up with egg on their lily-white faces after Sussman got through with them.

I hope that wolf-in-sheep’s clothing Neuhaus, who had pledged not to sell Valley View during his election campaign, and the cowardly weasels among the Republican majority in the county legislature (with the notable exception of Mike Anagnostakis) meet a similar fate.  Anagnostakis deserves special recognition for his courageous and principled stand on this issue.  As for the rest, what else can you call them but cowardly after they set up an LDC to do the deed and pretend it is independent when it is anything but? And just to put the stinko icing on the cake, here is the last paragraph of the news article in its entirety: “Griffin told the Times Herald-Record that the board will likely make public the names of all bidders — but not the prices they are offering — once the solicitation period ends. The identity and price of the winning bidder would be released once the county and buyer have signed a sale contract, he said.”

In other words, they will meet in secret, make their decision in secret, and only tell the public about it after the contract has been signed. I guess that’s one way to be independent: independent of public oversight or scrutiny. 

Michael can be reached at michael@zestoforange.com.