By Jeffrey Page
I do this every year around July 4 – sit down with my copy of the Declaration of Independence and marvel at this extraordinary, if imperfect, document, the signing of which amounted to a self-imposed death warrant for Jefferson, the Adamses, Franklin, Hancock and the others. The Declaration is, after all, a 26-count indictment of a sovereign.
The Declaration was the courageous thumb in the eye of George III and a hope for a reasoned future. But, problematically, it didn’t do much for all the participants in that American future.
I’m always astounded by the manner in which the signers described George III and his atrocities. Not once in the Declaration’s 1,381 words did they use his name. Instead, they reduced him to “he.” It said a great deal when the signers informed the world that the King’s outrages against his people entitled him to no more than a pronoun in history.
“He has plundered our Seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our Towns, and destroyed the Lives of our People.”
“He has kept among us, in Times of Peace, Standing Armies, without the consent of our Legislatures.”
“He has erected a Multitude of new Offices and sent hither Swarms of Officers to harass our People, and eat out their Substance.”
“He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the Executioners of their Friends and Brethren or to fall themselves by their Hands.”
And so on.
Just in case the world didn’t quite understand George’s treachery, the signers declared on paper what many colonists would have been afraid to whisper: “In every stage of these Oppressions we have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble Terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated Injury. A Prince, whose Character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the Ruler of a free People.”
The Declaration of Independence was not without defect. It spoke of the King’s atrocities but did so on behalf of one class of people, not for all classes.
The signers believed it was “self-evident” that all men are created equal. We, 236 years later, can insert italics to discuss certain truths that Jefferson et al. ignored. All men equal in 1776? It would have been more accurate for the signers to state it as: “all men, but not all men are created equal.”
The nation would require decades and centuries to finish what the Declaration began.
It took America 89 years after the Declaration of Independence to adopt the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, which outlaws slavery.
Five years later, the right of all citizens to vote (regardless of race, creed, or – most significantly – previous condition of servitude, but not regardless of sex) was guaranteed by the 15th Amendment.
It would take 144 years after the Declaration was signed for women to get the right to vote.
It was only as recently as 1964 – 48 years ago – that the 24th Amendment ended the payment of poll taxes. In 1971, the voting age was reduced to 18.
In a kind of reverse order, the Declaration has spent the last 236 years catching up to America, which itself hasn’t set speed records when it came to extending rights – or equality – to all.
It had its shortcomings, but when you read the Declaration’s charges against the King, plus the signers’ reasoned explanation to the world of how tyrannical George was and how they persevered in trying to reason with him, you find that you’re light years removed from what passes for political discourse in 2012.
jeffrey@zestoforange.com