Citizenship Games (cont’d.)
Wednesday, May 12th, 2010By Jeffrey Page
Last time, it was a member of the House of Representatives calling for the deportation of the children of illegal immigrants even if the kids are American citizens.
Duncan Duane Hunter, a first-termer from Southern California, would ship the kids back though he doesn’t say to where. Which raises the question: Why would Mexico or Poland, Peru or Saudi Arabia accept them if they’re native born citizens of the United States?
If he had actually read the 14th Amendment, Hunter might have been shocked to discover that his own U.S. citizenship is no more sacred than that of a young Chicano who was born or naturalized here – no matter if the kid’s parents are here legally or not.
But Hunter was last week’s news. Now, in the fearful time after the failed attempt to detonate a car bomb in Times Square, my friend Ken Farber sends along a note about the mischief Senator Joseph Lieberman is disguising as serious legislation. Lieberman would strip the citizenship of anyone who provides material support for a group that the government has designated a terrorist organization – whether or not that person has been convicted of a crime.
“Let’s just throw the Bill of Rights out the window,” Ken says in disgust.
“If they’re a U.S. citizen, until they’re convicted of some crime, I don’t know how you would attempt to take their citizenship away,” House Republican Leader John Boehner said. “It would be pretty difficult under the U.S. Constitution.”
Oh right, that bothersome Constitution.
Meanwhile, what is material support anyway?
Writing in The Washington Post, David Cole, a professor at the Georgetown University Law school, notes the meaning of “material support” is “so broad that it makes it a crime to file an amicus brief in the Supreme Court, to lobby Congress, to teach human rights or to write an op-ed piece, so long as it is done with, or for, a designated group.”
Could this mean that if you exercise your First Amendment right to petition the government on some matter that Joe Lieberman finds offensive you could lose your citizenship? I don’t believe we really want to go down that path.
On the matter of stripping someone of his citizenship, Cole says the Supreme Court has previously ruled that citizenship is a constitutional matter and thus can’t be arbitrarily terminated by the government.
In these dangerous days some politicians are trying to prove how tough they are. The problem for the rest of us is that people like Lieberman and his three co-sponsors – including Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts, the successor to Ted Kennedy – might not know when to stop. If we ship American kids out of the country and revoke the citizenship of people not convicted of anything, when do we get back to internment camps such as those to which earlier American citizens were exiled?
In the earlier dangerous days of the Forties, we shipped 120,000 citizens of Japanese ancestry to what amounted to internal deportation, snatching their homes and much of their property in the process. It took 50 years but the American people finally apologized for this atrocity and even paid $20,000 in reparations to each of the 60,000 survivors. This was not liberal gamesmanship.
“Here, we admit a wrong, here we reaffirm our commitment as a nation to equal justice under law,” President Reagan said as he signed that reparation measure into law in 1988.
Jeffrey can be reached at jeffrey@zestoforange.com