John Kerry: 21st Century Tool
By Michael Kaufman
I’m not sure what to make of John Kerry’s recent comment about the situation in Crimea: “You just don’t in the 21st century behave in 19th-century fashion by invading another country on completely trumped up pretext,” the Secretary of State said with a straight face during an interview on the CBS program “Face the Nation.” Later he proclaimed that the United States and “our allies” are prepared to meet “19th century behavior with 21st century tools” if necessary to return Crimea to its rightful place as part of the Ukraine. Kerry doesn’t realize that his empty rhetoric only serves to demonstrate that he himself—considered a 20th century hero by many—has become a 21st century tool.
Kerry didn’t spell out what he meant by “21st century tools” but it is not unreasonable to assume he is talking about the use of drones, a favorite of the Obama Administration because it doesn’t require “American boots on the ground” and that saves American lives, which are of course more precious than other people’s lives. That is the only possible explanation for their continued use in Afghanistan, where for every “enemy combatant” or terrorist killed by drone there are multiple deaths and crippling injuries inflicted on helpless civilians. As has often been pointed out, this tends to upset the locals and may even inspire some to become terrorist sympathizers, or even terrorists, themselves. But not to worry: We have enough drones to take care of them too.
Kerry’s “21st century tool rattling” was not war-like enough for traditional saber rattlers such as John McCain, who called Kerry’s comments “pathetic,” which they are—but not for the reasons cited by McCain. Our country’s leaders have used many a “trumped up pretext” to invade other countries well into the 21st century. It happened a whole lot in the 20th century, which may be why Kerry skipped over it as he made the rounds of TV interviews the other day. That reminds me: In just a few months it will be the 50th anniversary of the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the trumped up pretext used by Lyndon Johnson to escalate the genocidal war in Vietnam, as Kerry surely must recall. And of course there are a few 21st century elephants in the room as well, most notably the non-existent weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Kerry has said there is “no comparison” between the U.S. invasion of Iraq and Russia’s actions in Crimea. He’s right: Iraq has never been part of the United States and the lives of Americans living in Iraq at the time were not threatened. Crimea, however, has a long history of being part of Russia and the majority of the population there identifies as Russian. It did not become part of the Ukraine until 1958. And while many non-Russian Ukrainians supported and collaborated with Nazi Germany, the Russians were our allies during World War II and tens of millions died.
Perhaps this is a good time to point out how ill informed we are in this country as compared to say, Germany, because of the shallowness of news coverage by corporate media, reliance on official government versions of events, and the relative paucity of good investigative reporting. This leads to a kind of good guy versus bad guy way of looking at things: We are always the good guys. When there are conflicts elsewhere in the world we support the good guys. And if anyone mentions My Lai or Abu Ghraib or renditions or torture, well those things are only the work of a few bad apples. So here are a few things I learned the other day in a report from Berlin by correspondent Victor Grossman:
Grossman said the two major political parties in Germany have been working for regime change in the Ukraine for years. They hoped to help oust president Viktor Yanukovych and replace him with either imprisoned petroleum oligarch Yulia Timoshenko or former heavyweight boxing champion Vitali Klitchko. Klitchko had the backing of Adenauer Stiftung, a think tank associated with Angela Merkel’s Christian Democrats (CDU). (When Klitchko ran for mayor of Kiev a while back he hired Rudy Giuliani as an advisor….and still lost on points.)
Klitchko’s star faded after public release of a wiretapped conversation between U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and the U.S. Ambassador in Kiev, during which Nuland colorfully explained that Arseny Yatsenyuk was to be president, not boxer Klitchko or far-right anti-Semite Oleh Yaroslavovych Tyahnybok. “I don’t think ‘Klitsch’ should go into the government,” said Nuland. “I think ‘Yats’ is the guy who’s got the economic experience, the governing experience. He needs ‘Klitsch’ and Tyahnybok on the outside… talking to them four times a week.” And for good measure she added a few words not likely to endear her to our European friends: “Bleep the E.U.!”
According to Grossman, “A promising attempt by German, French and Polish foreign ministers to reach a compromise with Vladimir Putin, which seemed to be saving the day, and the Ukraine, was quickly met by a new burst of violent blood-letting on Maidan Square, mostly by masked men with fiery projectiles and sharp-shooting guns, which stymied the compromise and forced the corrupt (but democratically elected president) to flee for his life. And so, believe it or not, things worked out just exactly the way Nuland had determined, with “Yats” on top and the others outside.”
A former foreign policy advisor to Dick Cheney, Nuland is married to leading neo-con Robert Kagan whose Project for the New American Century think tank pushed military regime change in Iraq as part of a strategy for global control. Meanwhile Klitchko was not the only one to be embarrassed by release of a wiretap phone call. Timoshenko, who is usually portrayed as a frail martyr after spending time in a Ukrainian prison hospital, was recorded saying, “I’m sorry that I am unable to be there in charge of these processes; they wouldn’t have had a bleeping chance of getting Crimea off me….I would have found a way to finish off those bastards…I hope I can use all my connections and get the whole world to rise up so that not even scorched earth will be left of Russia.” As to Ukraine’s eight million ethnic Russians, Timoshenko said they should be “nuked.” This woman makes Sarah Palin look like Eleanor Roosevelt.
Grossman quotes several former German leaders, including Gerhard Schröder and Helmut Schmidt. The latter said with regard to Putin’s Crimea policy, “I find it completely understandable,” adding that he doubts it violated international law. He called punitive sanctions “stupid nonsense.” Schröder likened the referendum of Crimean Russians and their breakaway from the Ukraine to Kosovo’s declaration of independence from Serbia, which he had supported as Chancellor.
“The problem is not really in Moscow or here with us,” said Günter Verheugen, a former Social Democrat (SPD) party leader and European Commissioner. “The problem is in Kiev, where we now have the first government in the 21st century in which fascists are seated.”
Michael can be reached at michael@zestoforange.com.
Tags: John Kerry, Michael Kaufman, Victoria Nuland, Vitali Klitchko, Vladimir Putin, Yulia Timoshenko
April 10th, 2014 at 9:54 pm
Great work Michael.
You did your part to counterbalance “the shallowness of news coverage by corporate media, reliance on official government versions of events, and the relative paucity of good investigative reporting.” It was deeply depressing to witness a nearly round-the-clock media obsession with a missing airplane while the complex situation in the Ukraine and Crymia was given only the most superficial coverage.
As you point out, there are myriad examples of America pressuring remime change in distant countries with whom we had far less connection than Russia does to Crymia. How pathetic it is that the perspective is virtually absent in the major media discussion.
April 11th, 2014 at 3:57 pm
Thanks, Bennett. Perhaps even more pathetic is the ignorance displayed by people who are expected to be better informed. McCain, for example, visited Kiev to show solidarity with the protesters and was photographed on several occasions standing shoulder to shoulder with neo-Nazi leader Tyahnybok.
April 14th, 2014 at 6:13 pm
With all due respect to Mr. Verheugen, this is a silly statement: “The problem is in Kiev, where we now have the first government in the 21st century in which fascists are seated.” Besides being factually incorrect (members of the Golden Dawn party were seated in the Greek parliament in 2012, and Vladimir Zhirinovsky and several of his nationalist fellow travelers hold seats in the Russian Duma; Zhirinovsky’s public utterances, while risible, have been noted in the Russian press as stalking horses for the things Putin won’t say publicly), it falls far short of an honest assessment of what’s happening in Ukraine and Russia. And what’s happening is nothing short of a reconstituting of the Russian empire, with Czar Vladimir IV in charge of the reconstitution and corrupt dictators (Alexander Lukashenko in Byelorussia) and oligarchical puppets (Yanukovich) playing supporting roles. The last Czar Vladimir died in 1167, and there aren’t any Romanovs in a position to object, so Putin might as well crown himself, already.
There was plenty of solid reporting from Russian services and Reuters and a few Americans (David Filipov at the Boston Globe stands out in that crowd) that showed Sevastopol and Simferopol more or less shrugged at the appearance of Russian troops, but their presence goes back to the days of the Black Sea fleet. Cities like Kharkiv and Donetsk have firmly Ukrainian majorities, and any existential threat to Russian speakers there is pure invention, the same kind of hyperbole deployed by Yulia Timoshenko.
As for the anti-semites in Ukraine’s government, this statement by a wide cross-section of Jewish leaders in Ukraine was instructive, as well as an effective antidote to any crocodile tears Putin might shed for the Jews:
http://eajc.org/page32/news43672.html
I have no warm or cuddly feelings for John Kerry or John McCain, but they knew a popular uprising when they saw it. The leaders of that uprising aren’t the problem. A modern-day, empire-building czar with a KGB alum’s ruthlessness is very much a problem – for Jews, for gays, for Ukrainians and other ethnic minorities in the former Evil Empire and, most of all, for the stability of Europe.
April 15th, 2014 at 10:58 am
Oliver, thank you for your thoughtful comments and your correction re fascists parties in European parliaments besides Ukraine. I have no warm cuddly feelings for Putin, either. I dislike him for many of the same reasons you do. But this good-guy/bad-guy way of looking at the situation makes no sense to me. And I take any statement from a “cross-section of leaders” of the tiny remaining remnant of the Jewish population of the Ukraine with a pound of (kosher) salt. What else can they say without running the risk of a pogrom?
April 16th, 2014 at 6:44 pm
Zissen Pesach to you and yours, Michael. Helluva time for a discussion of the Exodus, right?
I agree with you on the uselessness of the good guy/bad guy approach, but Ukraine is a NATO ally. Putin is most assuredly not an ally. At best, he’s a rival, and he has a capacity to do destabilizing mischief in Europe that is unrivaled by anyone in Ukraine. As far as the Bandera-ites in the Ukrainian government, they’re a small, if vocal, minority, and there hasn’t been anything like a pogrom in Kiev or any other city in the wake of the Maidan violence and the ouster of Yanukovych, notwithstanding Putin’s proclamations. There has been isolated violence against Jews in the last six weeks, but it hasn’t been any different from what flares up occasionally in other parts of Europe, and yes, in Russia. When even a shrieker like Abe Foxman accuses Putin of flat-out lying about some impending resurgence of anti-semitism in Ukraine, that’s saying something. The only place where there are wholesale pograms going on now in that part of the world is in Crimea, where Putin is taking a page out of Uncle Joe’s playbook and kicking ethnic Tatars off their land. Add that together with his ostentatious deployment of Cossacks at the winter Olympics, and their proud beatdowns of unarmed women at the same, and you have a real good reason to worry about the standing of Jews in Russia more than you do about the phantoms Putin is summoning in Ukraine.
April 17th, 2014 at 12:21 pm
Thanks, Oliver. A sweet Passover to you as well. I see no point in arguing about which ethnic group in Eastern Europe is the more anti-Semitic. (And isn’t it amazing how antisemitism persists in places where there haven’t been any Jews–or only a tiny remnant–for decades?) I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said so far about Putin. It’s just that I don’t think there are any clean hands here, including those of the U.S., E.U. and NATO. It is all about economic control of resources and geopolitical supremacy. There have been more than enough victims in places like Vietnam, Chile, Nicaragua, Iraq, etc., to illustrate the point.
August 24th, 2014 at 10:47 am
Totally agree. John Kerry, with his aggressive comments on Edward Snowden, and with his passivity to what happened at UF during his speech involving the tasering incident, is a total TOOL.
I’m really ashamed of myself for having voted for him in 2004. We need new leaders. These guys are not the same people they claimed to have been during the vietnam era.