Let the Umpires Make Bad Calls

By Michael Kaufman

I admit it. I love it when an umpire makes a bad call, especially in a big game. The worse the call, the more I enjoy it.  I like to see an enraged manager rush from the dugout, waving his arms, snarling , kicking dirt on home plate or the umpire’s shoes. I like when a home-plate umpire angrily rips off his mask and gets in the guy’s face.  And there’s nothing wrong with a little flying spittle now and then.  I wait with anticipation for the moment when the ump has finally had enough and signals the old heave-ho by raising his arm, pointing at the offending party, and shouting, “You’re outta here!”

And sometimes it doesn’t stop there. The guy who got thrown out may turn and  yell at the top of his lungs as he is leaving. Maybe he will continue his tantrum and throw things onto the field when he gets to the dugout. Or maybe he’ll put on a disguise and watch the rest of the game from the stands. Sometimes others will continue the argument with the ump until they get tossed too. It’s all good.

Few things are more entertaining to me. The great old-time announcers like Red Barber used to refer lovingly to these tete-a-tetes as “rhubarbs.” Controversial calls and the ensuing rhubarbs have been almost as much a part of baseball lore as the all-time great batting and fielding achievements. If you are a longtime baseball fan you can think of a few off the top your head.

But you don’t hear much about rhubarbs any more. Advances in video technology have given us the ability to quickly assess the accuracy of a call. Was it a strike or a ball? Home run or foul ball? And now, the Lords of Baseball, in their infinite stupidity, have joined their counterparts in the National Football League, by introducing a video review process.  It started this year during the regular season and was used the other night in a World Series game to determine that Alex Rodriguez had indeed hit a home run and not a double, as originally called by the umpire. And so the game, already beset by lengthier delays than necessary to accomodate television advertisers, was delayed again so the umpires could shamble off the field, go into the clubhouse, and watch a video.  They looked pathetic.

And just what is so important about making the right call 100% of the time in a baseball (or football) game? Umpires and referees have a tough job and it is amazing they get the calls correctly as often as they do. Here is one football referee’s take on the subject, but it applies just as well to baseball:  “Yes, officials are supposed to get it right, but then again, so is that $5.5 million wide receiver who has dropped 60% of his passes this year, and so is that multi-million dollar coach who is 0-7 for the start of the season. Oh, and I guess we should mention the sportscaster who doesn’t really know the rules but yet feels totally comfortable second-guessing and sounding like an expert.” I’m with you, pal.

And don’t forget we are not talking brain surgery here, where the use of advanced video technology might save a person’s life. It is just a ballgame for crying out loud. Still, sports play a huge role in our society, which is why I fear the day may not be far off when a conversation like this takes place at the dinner table:

“What is this, chicken? You told me you were making the lamb chops tonight.”

“No … I said I was making chicken. You asked me right after you brushed your teeth.”

“No … you said lamb chops and it was after I came back from walking the dog… Let’s review it!”

“We can’t review it. You already used your three challenges for the week.”

Michael can be reached at michael@zestoforange.com.

Tags:

3 Responses to “Let the Umpires Make Bad Calls”

  1. LeeAgain Says:

    What I DON’T like to see is baseball being played during snow storms and fans suffering from frostbite. This year part of the World Series was played in temperatures below 40 degrees. Seems like baseball season gets longer at both ends every year. These guys are going to have a real problem running bases in snowshoes.

  2. MichaelKaufman Says:

    I could not agree with you more. The situation would be helped a lot if they went back to the 154-game schedule and eliminated the ridiculous “wild card” race that gives a second-place team a chance to win the World Series. (Simply give the first-place team with the best record a bye in the first round of each league’s playoffs and let the other two first-place teams compete to see who will play them for the pennant.) This makes sense in every way except that it would eliminate the profits the club owners bring in by extending the season.

  3. MichaelKaufman Says:

    FROM THE VIRTUAL MAILBAG

    Regarding last week’s post, JERRY SANDER writes: “Thank you, Michael, for taking note of the exchange of letters in The Advertiser between me and the Republican spokesperson. I was personally gratified to receive notice that I have “minions.” I’ve always wanted them, y’know, just for bragging rights. Not being astute enough to realize that the way to guarantee truly thoughtless minions — defined by Merriam-Webster as servile dependent(s), follower(s), or underling(s) is to go into politics –say, by being the Vice Chairman of some outmoded political party that used to run things the way they wanted to, unchallenged, in every nook and cranny of the county (outside of Middletown and Newburgh)– I will have to settle for the belief that my letter to the editor has stirred the souls of so many people I’ve never met that they were able to muster
    some upset at the sight of our President being portrayed as a Nazi in front of our post office just because he talks about extending health care to those who can’t afford it. Such was the creation of my minions. I send them my best, wherever they are. No such health-care affordability problems in Republican circles and a self-referential bunch they are. I’m glad my letter made them take note. Did you notice, too, that no one accused them of being racists before they defended themselves
    against this “charge”? I think the local gentry is getting nervous that they currently seem to be on the wrong side of American political history. They replay old phrases and hope for the best.
    My guess is that they will invest such old hopes in Sarah Palin for 2012 and go down in defeat again. It is a well-deserved one.”

    Thanks, Jerry. Although that was sent before election day, when local Republicans won big, I am inclined to agree with your overall analysis. I guess that makes me a minion.

    In keeping with Jerry’s analysis, poet Tony Seymour, a Zest reader who lives in San Francisco, sent along this bit of wishful thinking, written in September 2008:

    PLANNED
    OBSOLESCENCE

    DODO BIRDS—————1598-1866

    THE WHIG PARTY…………..1833-1866

    REPUBLICANS……………….1854-2009

    THEIR
    EXTINCTION
    WAS
    INEVITABLE!

Leave a Reply