In Covering Mets, the Times Drops Ball
By Michael Kaufman
I’ve known for a long time that The New York Times often falls short of its boastful claim to provide readers with “all the news that’s fit to print.” The Times has dropped the ball on any number of important issues over the years, including such weighty issues as the presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. But it has also dropped the ball on less weighty, but nonetheless irksome, matters, exemplified by its biased coverage of New York’s two major league baseball teams. And frankly, I’m sick of it.
Wednesday afternoon the Mets completed a three-game sweep of the San Francisco Giants, defending World Series champions and a contender for first place in the National League West. It was the 16th win in the last 25 games for the Mets and was especially noteworthy for the outstanding pitching of rookie right-handed hurler Zack Wheeler. Marlon Byrd, who hit a grand-slam home run in Tuesday’s game, hit a two-run homer Wednesday. The 35-year-old veteran outfielder has been a key contributor to the recent success of the team, with his glove and fine throwing arm as well the bat.
Another veteran, Omar Quintanilla, has been making spectacular plays at shortstop since taking over for the injured Ruben Tejada, and has also delivered a number of clutch hits with men on base (though none Wednesday). So what was the headline Thursday in the Times article about Wednesday’s game? “In Managing Harvey’s Innings, the Mets Make an All-Star Allowance.” Huh? The first 16 paragraphs of the article dealt with a topic that had already been widely discussed for days, namely that the Mets planned to rest their All-Star pitcher Matt Harvey during the final games before the All-Star Game, presumably in the hope that he would be named starting pitcher for the National League in the game Tuesday night at Citi Field. This is certainly an interesting topic and I have my own thoughts about it too—but it is not what I want to be reading about for the first 16 paragraphs of an article about Wednesday’s game by beat writer Andrew Keh. Even the Times Herald-Record, which hasn’t assigned beat writers to the Yankees and Mets for years (and which also has a long history of favoring the Yankees) got it right in their headline above a workmanlike article produced by the Associated Press: “Clean sweep for Zack, Mets, Wheeler mows down Giants.”
The Times’ bias against the Mets has been blatant all year. Both the Yankees and Mets opened the season at home April 1. The Mets won their game against the San Diego Padres by a score of 11-2. The Yankees lost to the Boston Red Sox, 8-2. The next day, the Times article about the Mets game was about a third the size of the article about the Yankees game. And, as noted in an email from Tad Richards (poet, director of Opus 40, and Mets fan) “It’s mostly about what a terrible team the Mets are and they can’t expect to have too many days like this. Instead of writing about what Cowgill and Byrd did in the game, they wrote about what they did last year. And, well, I could go on and on, but ‘Bleep the New York Times’ covers it.” (Only he didn’t say “Bleep.”)
Tad’s email, sent to a small cadre of Mets fans scattered across the country, drew unanimous agreement. After the Mets swept a four-game series from the Yankees in May, it was Tad’s daughter Caitlin who wrote, “Why can’t we get any respect? We just swept the Yankees for the first time in history, we played four great games, yet the Times articles are making excuses for the Yankees rather than applauding the achievements of the Mets. They were amazing. Let them have their moment.” Peter Jones agreed, noting, “The Times treats the Mets as if they were from Boston.” To which Tad added, “More like as if they were from Poughkeepsie.”
But I think Jon Richards, Tad’s brother (film critic, cartoonist for Huffington Post, and co-author of Nick and Jake) who may have said it best: “The Times sees the Yankees as the pinstriped Lords of Wall Street, and the Mets as the poor outerborough slobs who lose their house even if they’re paid up on their mortgage.”
Michael can be reached at michael@zestoforange.com.
Tags: Mets, Michael Kaufman, NY Times, Tad Richards, Yankees
July 17th, 2013 at 11:53 am
Ah, Michael, you made me laugh this morning, Red Sox fan that I am. The Mets are woefully underappreciated by the Times, for sure! You are so right on.
July 19th, 2013 at 10:17 am
Descrimination against the Mets extends up the Hudson River to Albany where the Times Union newspaper routinely relegates reports on Mets games to the inside pages while giving the Yankees, and even the Red Sox (can you believe that) sports page one coverage more often than not.
I was in a Hallmark shop the other day and they had all kinds of sports teams gifts for the Yankees, Red Sox, Jets, and Giants. Nothing, absolutely nothing with a Mets logo on it.
It’s as if Flushing is part of Europe and the Mets play rugby.
To paraphrase Rodney D, “We (the Mets) don’t get no respect!”
July 19th, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Thanks Carrie and Ken. One thing that also gets me is that in addition to burying the Mets coverage, they are woefully slow to note positive developments, such as the dramatic turnaround in Jeremy Hefner’s pitching this season and Dillon Gee’s improved performance. Outrageous is the word for ignoring the spectacular work by Josh Satin after the slumping Ike Davis was sent to the minors. But all this is nothing new. We’re used to it. It steels our resolve and makes us stronger. We know which team plays the real game of baseball in New York and it isn’t the one that has a DH in the lineup.